![]() In particular, the fundamental role of public authorities and the organs of local self-government began to include the observance of the right to peaceful assembly. It should be noted that, although in 2005-2009 there were some violations of the freedom of peaceful assembly, the situation as a whole has changed for the better owing to active introduction of the European experience of demonstrations, rallies and meetings. The international standards in the sphere of peaceful assembly oblige a state not only to guarantee the freedom of assembly, that is not to interfere in its implementation, but also imply the positive obligation to ensure this right. These are exactly the minimum standards and norms, according to which the state-parties should form their internal policy in order to ensure the observation of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly, and public authorities should create necessary conditions for its implementation. In 1997 the European Convention on Human Rights was ratified, Article 11 of which guarantees to everyone the right to freedom of peaceful assembly in 2007, under the auspices of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the ‘Guiding Principles on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly’ were approved with participation of Ukrainian representatives. “Prava Ludiny” (human rights) monthly bulletinįreedom of peaceful assembly is guaranteed by the Constitution and numerous international commitments accepted by Ukraine.Political persecution in modern Ukraine.History of the dissident movement in Ukraine.Analysis of the human rights situation in Ukraine.The Security service in a constitutional democracy.Prevention of discrimination and inequality.Human Rights Abuses in Russian-occupied Crimea. ![]() Human Rights Violations associated with EuroMaidan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |